Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions
Date
Msg-id 11612.1406009729@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions  (johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions  (johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The obvious query is
>>> SELECT * FROM register_uz_accounting_entities
>>> WHERE effective_on > '2014-07-11' OR (effective_on = '2014-07-11' AND
>>> id > 1459)
>>> ORDER BY effective_on, id
>>> LIMIT 100

>> A more readily optimizable query is
>> SELECT * FROM register_uz_accounting_entities
>> WHERE (effective_on, id) > ('2014-07-11'::date, 1459)
>> ORDER BY effective_on, id
>> LIMIT 100

> Yes, but that query has completely different semantics - I can't change
> that.

No, it doesn't.  Read it again ... or read up on row comparisons,
if you're unfamiliar with that notation.  The above queries are
exactly equivalent per spec.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: johno
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions
Next
From: Евгений Селявка
Date:
Subject: estimate btree index size without creating