Re: BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT.
Date
Msg-id 1161093.1719241071@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT.  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> When analyzing a relation with UDT, an error will be encountered if there is
> a join before the analyze stmts. Error message is "ERROR:  missing support
> function 1(16386,16386) in opfamily 16392".

What your example shows is a buggy (very incomplete) operator class.
This is not a Postgres bug.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943