Re: predefined functions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rafal Pietrak
Subject Re: predefined functions
Date
Msg-id 1160294864.4482.36.camel@zorro.isa-geek.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: predefined functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 01:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah: current_user (without the parens) is specified by the SQL
> standard, but we're not about to adopt such a brain-dead syntax
> for any of the functions defined by Postgres itself --- as you

I see. One of "committee's work gems" :(

And yet, does that really imply faulting syntax on "current_user()"?


--
-R

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: predefined functions
Next
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: Storing images in PostgreSQL databases (again)