On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 11:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak <rafal@zorro.isa-geek.com> writes:
> > Is this the expected result?
>
> timestamp_date() currently returns NULL if the timestamp is infinity.
> Since we don't have any representation for infinity in the date type,
I understand, you mean 'internal representation'. Since it's quite
obvious, that 'external representation' can be '+/-infinity', just like
it's the case with the timestamp.
> this is pretty much its only alternative other than throwing an error
> (which might indeed be a saner behavior). There is a TODO item to
> support +/-infinity in dates, which would be the correct long-term
> solution.
I see. Provided the internal representation must change to get there,
some immediate measure (like faulting the statement) might be a good
idea ideed.
--
-R
