Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date
Msg-id 115d51ec-1803-11ce-92a0-1082cc64fbc7@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Paul,

On 11/24/18 4:55 AM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM Paul A Jungwirth
> <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
>> Here is a patch for my progress on this so far.
> 
> Well this is embarrassing, but my last patch used the mistaken syntax
> `PRIMARY KEY (cols, WITHOUT OVERLAPS col)`. Here is a new patch which
> uses the correct syntax `PRIMARY KEY (cols, col WITHOUT OVERLAPS)`.
> Sorry about that! Also I went ahead and rebased it off current master.

I have marked this patch as targeting PG13 since it is clearly not 
material for PG12.  I also added you as the patch author.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Next
From: yuzuko
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with default partition pruning