On 11/14/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Jan de Visser" <jdevisser@digitalfairway.com> writes:
> > Any reason why this couldn't appear in the core of some future
> > version?
>
> You didn't read to the end of my post ;-). If a rownum() function
> like this didn't have any gotchas, I'd be in favor of putting it in,
> but I don't really want to set the behavior in stone just yet.
<g> That's me, the ADHD getting the better off.... Oh look, waffles!
:)
jan
