Re: pg_dump formatting - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump formatting
Date
Msg-id 11595.1237733040@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump formatting  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pg_dump formatting
List pgsql-admin
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 06:26:02 Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> COPY blarg (blah, bleh, blerg) FROM stdin;
>> 1       random character data
>> djfa;djjf;sdjl;afkjeoiuoiejk,cxjueiojiojeef98hkjdyf98y92hvniay8syfkdnf38932
>> hrhf9e83uifnskjjjjjj3h9r83hhjnnn2iyfhkjsndfi7y938hnksu879hf089h3n299ssdjfh92
>> 3
>>
>> the above in pg_dump is one line
>>
>> it'd be easier to diff if it were say on 3, or best yet with the
>> exception of say, binary data or things that can't be wrapped, have
>> the data (for like text records) wrapped at 79 characters or maybe 78
>> with \ at the end or something...

> Maybe wdiff will do what you want.

I don't think we'd consider making the kind of changes to the COPY
specification that would be needed to allow this sort of thing in COPY
mode.  However, it'd be pretty trivial to put \n instead of space
between fields in the INSERT dump formats.  I wonder whether that would
answer the need ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump formatting
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump formatting