On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 17:05 +0200, Tobias Brox wrote:
> [Scott Marlowe - Wed at 09:58:30AM -0500]
> > Have you tried chaning the cpu_* cost options to see how they affect
> > merge versus nested loop?
>
> As said in the original post, increasing any of them shifts the planner
> towards nested loops instead of merge_join. I didn't check which one of
> the cost constants made the most impact.
So, by decreasing them, you should move away from nested loops then,
right? Has that not worked for some reason?
