On Jun8, 2011, at 10:14 , Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Jun6, 2011, at 14:56 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tis, 2011-05-31 at 16:19 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>>> If people deem this to be a problem, we could instead add a separate
>>> function XPATH_VALUE() that returns VARCHAR, and make people use that
>>> for scalar-value-returning expressions.
>>
>> Why not replicate what contrib/xml2 provides, namely
>>
>> xpath_string()
>> xpath_number()
>> xpath_bool()
>>
>> That way, types are preserved.
>
> But then you lose the ability to evaluate user-supplied
> XPath expressions, because there's no way of telling which of these
> function to use.
>
> Since XPATH_BOOL() can be emulated by doing XPATH(...)::text::boolean
> if XPATH() implements the more lenient behaviour I proposed, that
> seems like a bad tradeoff overall.
Patch rebased onto HEAD.
best regards,
Florian Pflug
