On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:05 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> How close do your PITR patches take us to Oracle's "Standby Databases"?
> I'm trying to decide whether it's a "major features" for PR purposes or
> not.
That was pretty much the sweet spot I was aiming at. Many databases
support such functionality.
Oracle supports five gradations of functionality, of which we hit first
two. There is a sixth level also, which we can hit using Hannu's ideas
but thats a roll-your own for now.
It would be fair to say that we may support Standby Databases with
asynchronous log file shipping.
[I have an outstanding question on how to include LWlock support into
the archiver, required to flesh out the feature set, and of course
assuming these patches being accepted.]
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
