Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
Date
Msg-id 1154377665.6095.16.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors  (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 11:30, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
> On 31-7-2006 17:52, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> For a database system, however, processors hardly ever are the main
> bottleneck, are they? So you should probably go for a set of "fast
> processors" from your favorite supplier and focus mainly on lots of
> memory and fast disks. Whether that employs Opterons or Xeon Woodcrest
> (no other Xeons are up to that competition, imho) doesn't really matter.

Just making a quick comment here.  While the CPU core itself nowadays
certainly is not the most common bottleneck for a fast db server, the
ability of the CPU/Memory combo to act as a datapump IS often a limit.

In that case, you want to go with whichever setup gives you the fastest
access to memory.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
Next
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors