Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN
Date
Msg-id 11543.1499110794@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN  (Emrul <emrul@emrul.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN
List pgsql-hackers
Emrul <emrul@emrul.com> writes:
> Is this something that can be revisited for an upcoming release? Also, are
> there any technical problems that would be created by increasing this
> attribute?

This has been discussed before, eg here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23546.1353223443@sss.pgh.pa.us

You're free to build your own copy with whatever NAMEDATALEN you want,
but it seems unlikely to me that we'll change the default.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays