Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates
Date
Msg-id 11537.1117028225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: PseudoPartitioning and agregates  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> How hard would it be to have Postgres actually remove the gettimeofday
> overhead from the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output? 

Personally, I dislike measurement tools that lie to you under the flag
of producing more-easily-interpreted results.

As an example of why this would be a bad idea, the total time would no
longer be closely related to the actual elapsed time (as measured by
psql's \timing for instance) so you would be entirely unable to tell
whether there was some significant factor not being measured.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: IN/OUT parameters
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: WAL replay failure after file truncation(?)