On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 23:16 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Anyhow, please find enclosed the context-style diff.
How carefully did you test this?
postgres=# \df abc
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
--------+------+------------------+---------------------
public | abc | integer | a integer,b integer
(1 row)
(The argument list should be separated by both a comma and whitespace.)
postgres=# create or replace function xyz(inout a int, inout int)
returns record as 'select (1, 2);' language sql;
CREATE FUNCTION
postgres=# \df xyz
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
--------+------+------------------+----------------------------------
public | xyz | record | INOUT a integer, INOUT integer
(1 row)
(Spurious whitespace for the unnamed INOUT parameter.)
You need to schema-qualify references to builtin functions, to avoid
accidentally using functions of the same name that appear earlier in the
user's search path. (As a general rule, look at the surrounding code
carefully before you modify it.)
It would be nice to be consistent about SQL style, at least within a
single query (e.g. don't separate function arguments with whitespace in
some places but not others).
-Neil
