Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 4/14/14, 10:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Yes. It probably won't be a huge change, but it will need a bit of code.
> It might be more future-proof if the build farm just called make
> check-world and used some other way to identify the individual tests in
> that output. Otherwise, we'll need a new build farm release every time
> a test suite is added.
That argument would be more convincing if "make check-world" worked
on Windows ...
regards, tom lane
