Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Date
Msg-id 1148041593.2646.592.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to does wal archiving block the current client connection?  (Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>)
Responses Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
List pgsql-admin
Tree view 
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 10:08 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:

> May 18 08:00:18 discord postgres[20228]: [129-1] LOG:  archived transaction log file "00000001000000000000007F"
> May 18 08:00:41 discord postgres[20573]: [254-1] LOG:  archived transaction log file "00000001000000000000007F"
> May 18 08:00:41 discord postgres[20573]: [255-1] WARNING:  could not rename file
"pg_xlog/archive_status/00000001000000000000007F.ready"to 
> May 18 08:00:41 discord postgres[20573]: [255-2]  "pg_xlog/archive_status/00000001000000000000007F.done": No such
fileor directory 

I'm not clear how you can have two processes both issuing this message,
since it is only the archiver process that ever says this.

Do you have two archivers running on this system?
pid = 20229 and pid = 20573

Presumably pg_xlog/archive_status/00000001000000000000007F.done already
exists?

Are there two postmasters running (at all)?
Is there somehow an archiver process running from a previously shutdown
postmaster (somehow)?

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Mario Splivalo
Date:
Subject: Reclaiming used disk space
Next
From: Jeff Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?