Re: string primary key - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: string primary key
Date
Msg-id 1147365657.9755.69.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to string primary key  (Mark Gibson <mark@gibsonsoftware.com>)
Responses Re: string primary key  (Mark Gibson <mark@gibsonsoftware.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 10:52, Mark Gibson wrote:
> Is there a disadvantage to having the primary key for a table be a text
> type vs. an integer type?  Performance?  Any difference between having a
> varchar or char as a primary key?
>
> My instinct tells me that an integer is preferred, but I'm looking for a
> more concrete answer.

If you need a unique constraint on the text field anyway, and it's a
natural key, you're generally better of using that field as the pk.

However, if it's not a natually unique key, then it shouldn't be the pk,
and int is a perhaps better choice.

There are two VERY oppositional schools of thought on natural versus
artificial keys out there, and neither side is likely to change their
minds.

My preference is generally for artificial keys (i.e. sequence generated
ones) because I've had requirements change underfoot too many times to
rely on natural keys all the time.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Gibson
Date:
Subject: string primary key
Next
From: Blair Lowe
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC