Re: hardare config question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: hardare config question
Date
Msg-id 1146509515.22037.26.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hardare config question  (Tom Arthurs <tarthurs@jobflash.com>)
Responses Re: hardare config question
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:22, Tom Arthurs wrote:
> UPS does not protect against the tech behind the rack unplugging the
> power cable, or an accidental power cycle from exercising the wrong
> switch. :)  Both are probably more common causes of failure than a total
> power outage.
>
> Erik Myllymaki wrote:
> > I have been in discussion with 3ware support and after adjusting some
> > settings, the 3ware card in RAID 1 gets better performance than the
> > single drive. I guess this had everything to do with the write (and
> > maybe read?) cache.
> >
> > Of course now i am in a dangerous situation - using volatile write
> > cache without a BBU.
> >
> > If I were to use a UPS to ensure a soft shutdown in the event of power
> > loss, am I somewhat as safe as if I were to purchase a BBU for this
> > RAID card?

Nor does it prevent an electrician from dropping a tiny piece of wire
into a power conditioner, causing a feedback that blows the other two
power conditioners, all three industrial UPSes, and the switch that
allows the Diesal generator to take over.

When that happened to me, I had the only database server in the company
to come back up 100% in tact.  You can guess by now I also had the only
database server with battery backed cache...

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: hardare config question
Next
From: Chris Mckenzie
Date:
Subject: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.