On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:31, Douglas McNaught wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes:
>
> >> I don't feel it's a questionable reading of the GPL at all. In fact,
> >> it's pretty clear and I'm about 99% sure the FSF has commented on this
> >> as well. It's true that it's unlikely anyone would actually sue Debian
> >> over it but that doesn't somehow change what the licenses say.
> >> Additionally, I think supporting GNUTLS would be a good thing for
> >> Postgres to do even without this issue. I'd also like to see it support
> >> SASL and a k5login-style user-controllable mapping.
> >
> > So, do GPL have this problem linking against OpenSSL as well?
>
> Yes, that's why GPL apps like Exim and Courier have explicit license
> clauses permitting it.
So, it's freeradius that needs the exception then, right?
