On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes:
> > I thought from Douglas' message, it appeared BSD packages didn't need
> > such a clause...
>
> GPL partisans feel that BSD-with-advertising-clause is not compatible
> with the GPL. I think the sticking point here is that openssl is using
> an advertising clause.
But the way Douglas' message read, it was only GPL packages that should
be affected, and we're not GPL. Or did I or Douglas misunderstand the
situation?
