Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist
Date
Msg-id 11439.1137653867@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist  (Tony Caduto <tony.caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist  (Tony Caduto <tony.caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tony Caduto <tony.caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com> writes:
>> It would definately be nice if the end-user concept of column order
>> wasn't tied to the physical order in the database.

> Ok this may be over simplistic, but we have a attnum for the physical
> order, why not just add a attorder and then we could just change that
> numbering and order by that field instead of attnum?

Please go back and read the very extensive discussions of this question
a couple years ago in the pghackers archives (around the time we were
implementing DROP COLUMN, iirc).  There is no "just" about it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Execution of stored procedures