Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres?
Date
Msg-id 1143164218.79972.142.camel@home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 16:41 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> Now it gives a error that type double does not exist.
> >>> CREATE DOMAIN double AS float8;
> >>>
> >>> There, now the type exists ;)
> >> That's a little too perl for me ;)
> > 
> > I suppose it depends on the goal. If it is an application that is to be
> > supported on more than one database, defining types and other things for
> > a given DB type (PostgreSQL) is easier than injecting a large number of
> > SWITCH statements into the code.
> \
> 
> Why in the world would you build an application for anything except 
> PostgreSQL?

To prove that, as unbelievable as it sounds, it is possible to do such a
thing? Don't worry, such a thing would not get into a production
environment.

-- 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Static build of psql with readline support
Next
From: "Joel Miller"
Date:
Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync