Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless
Date
Msg-id 11424.1535909245@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_constraint.conincluding is useless  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> This requires a catversion bump, for which it may seem a bit late;
> however I think it's better to release pg11 without a useless catalog
> column only to remove it in pg12 ...

Catversion bumps during beta are routine.  If we had put out rc1
I'd say it was too late, but we have not.

If we do do a bump for beta4, I'd be strongly tempted to address the
lack of a unique index for pg_constraint as well, cf
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10110.1535907645@sss.pgh.pa.us

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_constraint.conincluding is useless