Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003
Date
Msg-id 1141779366.20504.17.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 16:36 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> The rationale is kinda mathematical.  A measure of deviation from
> central tendency (i.e. variance or stddev) is something where you
> probably don't want to normalize the weights.
>
> For example, the standard deviation of {0,1,1,1,2} is about 0.707, but
> the standard deviation of {0,1,2} is 1.

Well, I realize that stddev(DISTINCT x) != stddev(x) and that most
people are going to be interested in stddev(x), but I don't think it's
inconceivable for someone to be interested in stddev(DISTINCT x).
Explicitly checking for and rejecting it doesn't serve any useful
purpose that I can see, beyond compliance with the letter of the
standard -- if the user asks for stddev(DISTINCT x), are we really
providing useful behavior if we refuse to calculate it?

-Neil



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: variance aggregates per SQL:2003