Re: Postgres and Ingres R3 / SAN - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mark Lewis
Subject Re: Postgres and Ingres R3 / SAN
Date
Msg-id 1141759250.4237.7.camel@archimedes
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres and Ingres R3 / SAN  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres and Ingres R3 / SAN
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 13:00 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

...

> PostgreSQL on a SAN won't buy you what I think you think it will. It's
> essentially impossible to safely run two PostgreSQL installs off the
> same data files without destroying your data. What a SAN can buy you is
> disk-level replication, but I've no experience with that.

It is possible to run two instances against the same SAN using tools
such as RedHat's Cluster Suite.  We use that in-house as a cheap
alternative for Oracle clustering, although we're not using it for our
PostgreSQL servers yet.  It's not for load balancing, just
active/passive fault tolerance.

-- Mark Lewis

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Can anyone explain this pgbench results?
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres and Ingres R3 / SAN