-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, not to rain on the parade or anything, but I'll bet that
> rejiggering anything at all here will result in whining that puts the
> 8.3-era removal of a few implicit casts to shame.
I'll take that bet, as it's really hard to imagine anything being worse
than the pain caused by 8.3 to many people using Postgres. But if
this is anything at all like that (e.g. requiring rewriting tons of
SQL queries or modifying system catalogs), then a big fat -1.
I know, probably a moot point by now, but 8.3 is a sore spot
for me. :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201105082230
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAk3HU0IACgkQvJuQZxSWSshp2gCeLzjdXPQ0NkwDzby0f8DzUErz
FUEAoLNkIzJ5jWxVP2Ck3BZgxhd6HUhq
=yALY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
