Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jeffrey W. Baker
Subject Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Date
Msg-id 1138468133.9336.5.camel@noodles
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
List pgsql-performance
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 10:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Assuming that "month" means what it sounds like, the above would
> result
> in running twelve parallel sort/uniq operations, one for each month
> grouping, to eliminate duplicates before counting.  You've got sortmem
> set high enough to blow out RAM in that scenario ...

Hrmm, why is it that with a similar query I get a far simpler plan than
you describe, and relatively snappy runtime?

  select date
       , count(1) as nads
       , sum(case when premium then 1 else 0 end) as npremium
       , count(distinct(keyword)) as nwords
       , count(distinct(advertiser)) as nadvertisers
    from data
group by date
order by date asc

                                          QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GroupAggregate  (cost=0.00..14452743.09 rows=721 width=13)
   ->  Index Scan using data_date_idx on data  (cost=0.00..9075144.27 rows=430206752 width=13)
(2 rows)

=# show server_version;
 server_version
----------------
 8.1.2
(1 row)

-jwb


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries