Re: Does this look ethical to you? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Devrim GUNDUZ
Subject Re: Does this look ethical to you?
Date
Msg-id 1138117171.4117.33.camel@evim.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does this look ethical to you?  (Tony Caduto <tony.caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
Responses Re: Does this look ethical to you?  (Tony Caduto <tony.caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 07:56 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> I don't think mentioning a product as a alternative to pgAdmin III is
> wrong since pgAdmin III has such a big advantage being distributed
> with
> the Windows version of Postgresql.  It almost has monopoly written on
> it
> since the user is not given any idea that there is anything else
> available. At least you are not forced to install it, but still a
> HUGE,HUGE advantage over any other competing product.

IMHO pgAdmin does not compete with other "products", since it is a
community-driven GUI for PostgreSQL. Look what you wrote yesterday:

On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 20:52 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> I am kind of ticked off that they are hijacking my product name this
> way.

PGLA is *your* *product*, but pgAdmin is community software. As stated
before, I think many people will be glad if you distribute PGLA (or a
part of it) as OSS.

So pgAdmin is apart from many other GUIs since it is OSS and has
excellent features like Slony, GE, etc. It deserves to be distributed
with Windows Installer, unless another Open Source GUI which may beat
pgAdmin with its features appears on the stage. Also it is available on
Linux and some *nix systems, which I think is one of the best features.

Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Gevik"
Date:
Subject: Re: user defined function
Next
From: "Sander Steffann"
Date:
Subject: Re: RAID 5 and postgresql