Re: pg_plan_advice - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_plan_advice
Date
Msg-id 1136161.1769654478@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_plan_advice  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_plan_advice
Re: pg_plan_advice
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> That rearrangement got done in v11, and I've now committed that patch
> after fixing a few typos that I found. Cautiously, woohoo, but let's
> see if anything breaks.

skink's not happy:

=2162940== VALGRINDERROR-BEGIN
==2162940== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==2162940==    at 0x434D366: cost_material (costsize.c:2593)
==2162940==    by 0x436E7E9: materialize_finished_plan (createplan.c:6531)
==2162940==    by 0x4383054: standard_planner (planner.c:533)
==2162940==    by 0x4383541: planner (planner.c:324)
==2162940==    by 0x44C50B4: pg_plan_query (postgres.c:905)
==2162940==    by 0x4237444: standard_ExplainOneQuery (explain.c:354)
==2162940==    by 0x42375DF: ExplainOneQuery (explain.c:310)
==2162940==    by 0x4237A7A: ExplainOneUtility (explain.c:458)
==2162940==    by 0x42375C3: ExplainOneQuery (explain.c:301)
==2162940==    by 0x4237745: ExplainQuery (explain.c:224)
==2162940==    by 0x44CC834: standard_ProcessUtility (utility.c:868)
==2162940==    by 0x44CD09D: ProcessUtility (utility.c:525)
==2162940==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==2162940==    at 0x436E76A: materialize_finished_plan (createplan.c:6506)
==2162940== 
==2162940== VALGRINDERROR-END

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: ATPrepCmd: cleanup unreachable AT_AddIndexConstraint handling
Next
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Fix logical decoding not track transaction during SNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT