Re: Single-Transaction Utility options - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date
Msg-id 1134932126.2964.187.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single-Transaction Utility options  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Single-Transaction Utility options  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Single-Transaction Utility options  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:03 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.
>
> I meant to ask, why is this not the default or only behavior?

Historically, it didn't work that way, so I hadn't thought to change
that behaviour. We could I suppose... but I'm happy with just an option
to do --single-transaction.

> Your
> patch does not contain a documentation update, and so the user has no
> information about why to use this option or not.

I was waiting for tech approval of the patch before writing the docs. A
doc patch is enclosed.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Volkan YAZICI
Date:
Subject: tuple count and v3 functions in psql for COPY
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options