Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date
Msg-id 1133377185.4491.269.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:33, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Someone suggested earlier that we should drop the binaries for
> nonsupported versions completely from the ftp site. Thoughts on this?
>
> If not, they should at least go into OLD as well. But personally, I'm
> for dropping them completely. If you're on something that old (heck, we
> have 7.0 binaries..), you can still build from source.
>

I'm against the idea... the cost for us is minimal, and the hassle
involved in building from source is quite large.


Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Shared locking in slru.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange interval arithmetic