Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions
Date
Msg-id 11319.1550115484@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
And, while I'm complaining: why the devil is use of the compiler builtins
gated by HAVE__GET_CPUID?  This is unbelievably Intel-centric, because
it prevents use of the builtins on other architectures.  If the builtin
exists, we should use it, full stop.  There's no reason to expect that it
would be slower than hand-rolled code, regardless of the architecture.

I'd be inclined to rip out all of the run-time-detection logic here;
I doubt any of it is buying anything that's worth the price of an
indirect call.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions