Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-07-01 10:51:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The problem is that there are multiple risks to manage here. If I were to
>> back-patch that patch, it would actively break any third-party extensions
>> that might be using the formerly-considered-valid technique of passing a
>> NULL array pointer to these lookup functions. We don't like breaking
>> things in minor releases; that discourages people from updating to new
>> minor releases.
> Yep, let's just fix it in master (and potentially 9.5, I don't care).
It's in the 9.5 branch already.
regards, tom lane
