Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Date
Msg-id 1130921305.8300.1720.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data  (Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>)
Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Anybody like to work out a piece of SQL to perform data profiling and
> > derive the distribution of values with trailing zeroes?
> 
> Don't forget leading zeroes.  And all-zero (we omit digits entirely in
> that case).  I don't think you can claim that zero isn't a common case.

The question is: how common?

For INTEGERs I would accept that many are often zero. For NUMERIC, these
are seldom exactly zero, IMHO.

This is one of those issues where we need to run tests and take input.
We cannot decide this sort of thing just by debate alone. So, I'll leave
this as a less potentially fruitful line of enquiry.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags