On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 18:30 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I thought char was actually stored variable-length...? I know there's a
> type that actually acts like char does on most databases, but I can't
> remember what it is off-hand (it should be mentioned in docs 8.3...)
You are correct on that point, but IMHO that doesn't change the
situation sufficiently for the main part of this thread.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
