Re: backend unexpected SIG KILL (9) - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: backend unexpected SIG KILL (9)
Date
Msg-id 1127147911.30120.100.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to backend unexpected SIG KILL (9)  (David Stanaway <david@stanaway.net>)
List pgsql-admin
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 11:16, David Stanaway wrote:
> Why would the backend get a KILL signal like this? It was doing a
> routine select ... into , or a copy ... to at the time.
>
>
> 2005-09-19 09:52:46 [1511] LOG:  server process (PID 19446) was
> terminated by signal 9
> 2005-09-19 09:52:46 [1511] LOG:  terminating any other active server
> processes
> 2005-09-19 09:52:46 [1712] WARNING:  terminating connection because of
> crash of another server process
> DETAIL:  The postmaster has commanded this server process to roll back
> the current transaction and exit, because another server process exited
> abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory.
> HINT:  In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the database and
> repeat your command.
>
>
> Debian 7.4.3 package
> Version: 7.4.3-3


More than likely some system memory limit was hit and the linux OOM
killer kicked in and started killing processes.  Unfortunately, it tends
to kill things using a lot memory to free up as much as possible.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: David Stanaway
Date:
Subject: backend unexpected SIG KILL (9)
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Backup issue