Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ian Westmacott
Subject Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT
Date
Msg-id 1126628214.11675.55.camel@spectre.intellivid.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic  (Brandon Black <blblack@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:30, Brandon Black wrote:
> I started looking closer at my options for partitioning (inheritance,
> union all), and at Bizgres today.  Bizgres partitioning appears to be
> basically the same kind of inheritance partitioning one can do in
> mainline PostgreSQL.  Am I correct in thinking that the main
> difference is that they've coded support for
> "enable_constraint_exclusion=true" so that the query planner can be
> more effective at taking advantage of the partitioning when you've
> specified CHECK constraints on the child tables?  I may go for 8.1
> instead in that case, as the main win I'm looking for is that with
> inheritance I'll be doing inserts into smaller tables instead of ones
> that grow to unmanageable sizes (and that I can drop old child tables
> instead of delete/vacuum).

Perhaps I missed something in this thread, but don't forget
you still need vacuum to reclaim XIDs.

    --Ian



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: evgeny gridasov
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT