Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog
Date
Msg-id 1126116138.15992.21.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:40, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Qingqing Zhuo wrote:
> > Xlog will be the only believable data if your system crashed. So it is a dangerous practice to put xlog stuff in
RAID0.
>
> No more or less so than putting your main database on RAID0. If any
> drive fails, you lose everything.

Sounds like a good place to have replication.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: 64 bits?
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: SLOOOOOOOW