Re: Application name patch - v3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Application name patch - v3
Date
Msg-id 11186.1262016412@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v3  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Responses Re: Application name patch - v3  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes:
> Le 28/12/2009 10:07, Dave Page a �crit :
>> Yes, still waiting on the new API.

> Is there something I can do to make this move forward?

I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array
or two parallel arrays.  Do you want to try coding up a sample usage
of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing pg_migrator limitations
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs