Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mark Rinaudo
Subject Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Date
Msg-id 1118096900.1893.58.camel@penguin1
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
List pgsql-performance
I'm running the Redhat Version of Postgresql which came pre-installed
with Redhat ES. It's version number is 7.3.10-1.  I'm not sure what
options it was compiled with. Is there a way for me to tell?  Should i
just compile my own postgresql for this platform?

Thanks
Mark

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com> writes:
> > On 06 Jun 2005 12:53:40 -0500, Mark Rinaudo <mark@bowmansystems.com> wrote:
> >> I'm not sure if this is the appropriate list to post this question to
> >> but i'm starting with this one because it is related to the performance
> >> of Postgresql server.  I have a Penguin Computing dual AMD 64 bit
> >> opteron machine with 8 Gigs of memory.  In my attempt to increase the
> >> number of shared_buffers from the default to 65000 i was running into a
> >> semget error when trying to start Postgresql.
>
> > Did you perhaps disable spinlocks when compiling PG?
>
> That sure looks like it must be the issue --- in a normal build the
> number of semaphores needed does not vary with shared_buffers, but
> it will if Postgres is falling back to semaphore-based spinlocks.
> Which is a really bad idea from a performance standpoint, so you
> want to fix the build.
>
> Which PG version is this exactly, and what configure options did
> you use?  What compiler was used?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
--
Mark Rinaudo
318-213-8780 ext 111
Bowman Systems


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine