Re: Autonomous Transactions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Matt Miller
Subject Re: Autonomous Transactions
Date
Msg-id 1117829429.7993.43.camel@dbamm01-linux
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autonomous Transactions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl>)
Responses Re: Autonomous Transactions
List pgsql-general
> > a way to enable a function to commit a unit of work that
> > does not affect the caller's transaction.

> you can establish an independent connection within a function in, say,
> PL/Perl or PL/Python.

Okay, multiple connections seems to be my best shot.  However, I would
like standard developers to be able to stay in PL/pgSQL and SQL.  If
each of our anonymous transactions needs to be coded in PL/Perl then
people are not as happy.  (Silly people.)

So, can I write some dirty little utility functions (in PL/Perl, C,
whatever) that a PL/pgSQL caller use to somehow switch connections?  The
way our apps are currently structured I'm picturing that each app's
logical connection is actually two physical connections: the main thread
of control happens on one connection, and autonomous transactions happen
on the other connection.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Preventing Multiple Inheritance
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Autonomous Transactions