Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Date
Msg-id 1117626859.3844.945.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 16:34 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > There are some other arguments in favour of a LOAD command.... Alon?
> 
> We already have LOAD, so you'll have to choose something else :)

Its annoying, I grant you. :-)

LOAD 'library' would still need to be the default.

LOAD LIBRARY 'library' would be the new recommended usage.

LOAD DATA... would be the new command... with most other options hanging
off of that. There's no problem with that, since that is then the same
as Oracle syntax for the load utility.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Cave-Ayland"
Date:
Subject: Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks
Next
From: Dawid Kuroczko
Date:
Subject: Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions