Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze

From: Mischa Sandberg
Subject: Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze
Date: ,
Msg-id: 1115846865.428278d135357@webmail.telus.net
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Guillaume Smet)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Guillaume Smet, )
 Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Tom Lane, )
   Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Guillaume Smet, )
    Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Tom Lane, )
     Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Guillaume Smet, )
      Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Tom Lane, )
       Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Guillaume Smet, )
        Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Markus Bertheau, )
 Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze  (Mischa Sandberg, )

Quoting Guillaume Smet <>:

> Hi,
>
> We have some performances problem on a particular query.
...

I have to say it, this was the best laid-out set of details behind a
problem I've ever seen on this list; I'm going to try live up to it, the
next time I have a problem of my own.




pgsql-performance by date:

From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA raid?
From: Alex Stapleton
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering