Whoa, hold on. My original post was this:
QUOTE:
Generally XFS and JFS are considered superior to ext2/3.
ext3, in my experience, isn't much slower than ext2. Plus the decreased
time required to bring up a server after a power outage is worth
something too.
Having used ext3 quite a bit, I'd say it's fairly stable and reliable,
but I have seen references here to know, possibly unfixable bugs.
I've used XFS a few years back, and there was no great gain for what we
were doing at the time, as we were CPU, not I/O bound.
ENDQUOTE:
So where do you get off saying I'm such a big fan of XFS and am trashing ext3.
You do the research, I'm tired of trying to have a civilized conversation with you.
If you wanna argue, go pay someone a quarter to do it, I'm done.
