Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.
Date
Msg-id 11123.1314420984@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.  ("mark" <dvlhntr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
"mark" <dvlhntr@gmail.com> writes:
> Expected behavior would be -T would mean a hard cut off.

Why would you expect that?

What I'd expect is that each transaction would be run to completion,
which would mean that -T cannot possibly be exact.  Even if it were,
what's your notion of "exact"?  Clock resolutions are different on
different platforms.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "mark"
Date:
Subject: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.