Re: Many persistant client connections - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From lst_hoe01@kwsoft.de
Subject Re: Many persistant client connections
Date
Msg-id 1112259136.424bba40cf286@webmail.kwsoft.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Many persistant client connections  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
Responses Re: Many persistant client connections  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Zitat von Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>:

> lst_hoe01@kwsoft.de writes:
> > i would like to know if there is something like the Oracle "shared
> > server" possible with PostgreSQL. I have searched the archives but
> > have not found any real discussion regarding this.
> >
> > We have two CTI applications opening 2-3 persistant connections to
> > the address server (PostgreSQL). With 100 clients we get around 400
> > persistant connections eating up the server memory and have nothing
> > to work most of the time.
>
> Sounds like a case for looking into pgpool...
>
>   <http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/>
>
> pgpool is a connection pool system implemented in C that can allow
> sharing of connections for many cases like the one you describe.

Thanks for the info. Is this the recommended way to handle many persistant
client connections or are there other opinions/possibilities?

Regards

Andreas


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Morus Walter
Date:
Subject: Re: connectivity to database been an issue for me.
Next
From: Zouari Fourat
Date:
Subject: Re: problems with user rights