Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Kelly Burkhart
Subject Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux
Date
Msg-id 1111433339.26601.89.camel@krb06
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux
Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux
List pgsql-odbc
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 09:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. März 2005 16:05 schrieb Kelly Burkhart:
> > I'm attaching a patch which fixes this, and some other questionable
> > sprintf format strings in convert.c.
>
> Do we have any evidence that the other ones are broken?

No, I do not.

I suggested that the other format strings were questionable based on a
reading of the glibc printf man page.  Aside from the 32-bit integer
problem the other formats work fine in the unmodified form on the three
platforms I use.

Can anyone with a better understanding of the libc standard comment on
the "correctness" of the following lines?

int8_t i1;
int16_t i2;

printf("%d", i1);
printf("%d", i2);

vs:

printf("%hhd", i1);
printf("%hd", i2);

-K

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: "Philippe Lang"
Date:
Subject: Command Prompt Commercial ODBC driver?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux