Re: Massive performance differences - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ragnar Hafstað
Subject Re: Massive performance differences
Date
Msg-id 1110910730.26976.60.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Massive performance differences  (Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org>)
Responses Re: Massive performance differences  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 18:10 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:

> explain analyze select * from veranstaltung_original order by semester;
>
>   Sort  (cost=3054.08..3067.74 rows=5467 width=223) (actual
> time=2568.10..2573.02 rows=5467 loops=1)
>     Sort Key: semester
>     ->  Seq Scan on veranstaltung_original  (cost=0.00..2714.67 rows=5467
> width=223) (actual time=1936.68..2506.83 rows=5467 loops=1)
                          ^^^^^^^
isn't this value (1936.68) suspiscious for a seq scan ?
can a lot of dead tuples cause this?
maybe VACUUM FULL ANALYSE time ?

gnari



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Glenn Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Installation on XP
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Massive performance differences