Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From tony
Subject Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?
Date
Msg-id 1110557996.3655.42.camel@hush
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-general
Le vendredi 11 mars 2005 à 16:51 +0100, Magnus Hagander a écrit :

> Do *not* do this with a production database.
>
> Vmware does *not* correctly handle fsync()s (or O_SYNC or any of those)
> thruogh to disk. If your host PC crashes, your database will almost
> certainly be corrupted. fsync() on the client just puts it in the RAM
> cache on the host. Not even in the write cache on the disk/raid.

Putting Windows NT inside a virtual machine (VMware workstation) solved
all hardware stability problems in my case. NT would only crash if we
forgot to reboot every 45 days or so... The Linux host had a 9 month
uptime at one point.

If you could be more explicit as to why VMware client does not write to
disk I would much appreciate. I was thinking of virtualising a couple of
servers (Linux client on Linux host). TIA

Tony Grant


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Best practices: Handling Daylight-saving time
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Best practices: Handling Daylight-saving time