What's better: Raid 0 or disk for seperate pg_xlog - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Karim Nassar
Subject What's better: Raid 0 or disk for seperate pg_xlog
Date
Msg-id 1110440684.6368.163.camel@k2.cet.nau.edu
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: What's better: Raid 0 or disk for seperate pg_xlog  (David Brown <time@bigpond.net.au>)
Re: What's better: Raid 0 or disk for seperate pg_xlog  (John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>)
Re: What's better: Raid 0 or disk for seperate pg_xlog  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
List pgsql-performance
From rom http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList/

"even in a two-disk server, you can put the transaction log onto the
operating system disk and reap some benefits."

Context: I have a two disk server that is about to become dedicated to
postgresql (it's a sun v40z running gentoo linux).

What's "theoretically better"?

1) OS and pg_xlog on one disk, rest of postgresql on the other? (if I
   understand the above correctly)
2) Everything striped Raid 0?
3) <some answer from someone smarter than me>

TIA,
--
Karim Nassar
Department of Computer Science
Box 15600, College of Engineering and Natural Sciences
Northern Arizona University,  Flagstaff, Arizona 86011
Office: (928) 523-5868 -=- Mobile: (928) 699-9221

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mischa
Date:
Subject: Multi-line requests in COPY ... FROM STDIN
Next
From: David Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: What's better: Raid 0 or disk for seperate pg_xlog